Will the scientific and educational environment of the proposed program contribute to its intended goals? Is there a plan to take advantage of this environment to enhance the educational value of the program? Is there tangible evidence of institutional commitment?
Is there evidence that the faculty have sufficient institutional support to create a sound educational environment for the participants? Where appropriate, is there evidence of collaboration and buy-in among participating programs, departments, and institutions?
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact score, but will not give separate scores for these items.
For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1 risk to subjects, 2 adequacy of protection against risks, 3 potential benefits to the subjects and others, 4 importance of the knowledge to be gained, and 5 data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.
For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate: 1 the justification for the exemption, 2 human subjects involvement and characteristics, and 3 sources of materials.
For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects.
For additional information on review of the Inclusion section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Inclusion in Clinical Research. The committee will evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals as part of the scientific assessment according to the following criteria: 1 description of proposed procedures involving animals, including species, strains, ages, sex, and total number to be used; 2 justifications for the use of animals versus alternative models and for the appropriateness of the species proposed; 3 interventions to minimize discomfort, distress, pain and injury; and 4 justification for euthanasia method if NOT consistent with the AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals.
Reviewers will assess the use of chimpanzees as they would any other application proposing the use of vertebrate animals. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animal Section. For Resubmissions, the committee will evaluate the application as now presented, taking into consideration the responses to comments from the previous scientific review group and changes made to the project.
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Generally not applicable. Reviewers should bring any concerns to the attention of the Scientific Review Officer.
Reviewers will comment on whether the following Resource Sharing Plans, or the rationale for not sharing the following types of resources, are reasonable : 1 Data Sharing Plan ; 2 Sharing Model Organisms ; and 3 Genomic Data Sharing Plan.
If support for development, maintenance, or enhancement of software is requested in the application, the reviewers will comment on the proposed software dissemination plan. Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research. Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate Scientific Review Group s convened by NHGRII, in accordance with NIH peer review policy and procedures , using the stated review criteria.
Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications submitted in response to this FOA. Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research. The following will be considered in making funding decisions:.
Refer to Part 1 for dates for peer review, advisory council review, and earliest start date. A formal notification in the form of a Notice of Award NoA will be provided to the applicant organization for successful applications. Awardees must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.
Funding Restrictions. Selection of an application for award is not an authorization to begin performance. Any costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the recipient's risk. These costs may be reimbursed only to the extent considered allowable pre-award costs. This includes any recent legislation and policy applicable to awards that is highlighted on this website. Recipients of federal financial assistance FFA from HHS must administer their programs in compliance with federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, age and, in some circumstances, religion, conscience, and sex.
This includes ensuring programs are accessible to persons with limited English proficiency. Thus, criteria in research protocols that target or exclude certain populations are warranted where nondiscriminatory justifications establish that such criteria are appropriate with respect to the health or safety of the subjects, the scientific study design, or the purpose of the research.
An applicant, at its option, may review information in the designated integrity and performance systems accessible through FAPIIS and comment on any information about itself that a Federal agency previously entered and is currently in FAPIIS. Continuation support will not be provided until the required forms are submitted and accepted.
Programs that involve participants should report on education in the responsible conduct of research and complete a Training Diversity Report , in accordance with the RPPR Instruction Guide. The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of Transparency Act , includes a requirement for awardees of Federal grants to report information about first-tier subawards and executive compensation under Federal assistance awards issued in FY or later.
Failure by the recipient institution to submit required forms in a timely, complete, and accurate manner may result in an expenditure disallowance or a delay in any continuation funding for the award. In accordance with the regulatory requirements provided at 45 CFR The recipient must also make semiannual disclosures regarding such proceedings. Proceedings information will be made publicly available in the designated integrity and performance system currently FAPIIS.
This is a statutory requirement under section of Public Law , as amended 41 U. As required by section of Public Law , all information posted in the designated integrity and performance system on or after April 15, , except past performance reviews required for Federal procurement contracts, will be publicly available.
In carrying out its stewardship of human resource-related programs, the NIH or its Institutes and Centers will periodically evaluate their R25 research education programs, employing the measures identified below. Upon the completion of a program evaluation, NIH and its ICs will determine whether to a continue a program as currently configured, b continue a program with modifications, or c discontinue a program.
In evaluating this research education program NHGRI expects to use the following evaluation measures:. We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.
Heather A. Rudy Pozzatti, Ph. Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. Department of Health and Human Services. Overview Information. Components of Participating Organizations. Number of Applications. Only one application per institution is allowed. January 25, , January 25, , January 25, All applications are due by PM local time of applicant organization.
December , December , December Required Application Instructions. Part 2. Full Text of Announcement. Section I. Funding Opportunity Description. Flat, compact ABS housing. Share Copied. Search now. Contents and categories. Environment-friendly The high energy efficiency, the long service life of the LED lamps and the low level of heat dissipation make this device particularly environment-friendly.
LED technology LEDs are ideal for use in lighting systems: They are bright and have a low level of heat dissipation, a long operating life and low energy consumption. UV UV and black light lamps are used to create decorative or artistic effects. Cameo Catalogue. Eco label. Photometric measurements. Technical drawing. Compatibility list. Product images.
Category: Image files Type: zip File size: -. There must not be glare on eyeglasses that obscures the eye s. There must not be shadows or refraction from the eyeglasses that obscures the eye s. If you normally wear a hearing device or similar articles, they may be worn in your photo. Review the Photo Examples to see examples of acceptable and unacceptable photos.
In addition, snapshots, magazine photos, low quality vending machine or mobile phone photos, and full-length photographs are not acceptable. If you are applying for a nonimmigrant visa by filling out the DS or DS online form, the form will instruct you to upload your digital image as part of completing the online visa application form.
Review the Digital Image Requirements , which also provide additional requirements if you are scanning an existing photo.
Some embassies and consulates require visa applicants to bring one 1 photo, which meets requirements, to the interview. Review the embassy or consulate instructions where you will apply to learn more. If you are applying for an immigrant visa, using Form DS, you must provide two 2 identical photos at your immigrant visa interview.
Your photos must be:. If you are entering the Diversity Visa DV Program online, you must upload your digital image as part of your entry. Your digital image must be:.
Do you want to scan an existing photo? In addition to the digital image requirements, your existing photo must be:. Each DV applicant will need to bring two 2 identical photos to the interview. While we recommend you use a professional visa photo service to ensure your photo meets all the requirements, you may take the photo yourself. Photos must not be digitally enhanced or altered to change your appearance in any way.
Please review the following technical requirements and references for guidance on taking your own photo. Please note: This tool is intended for photo cropping only. A Department of State employee will make the final decision whether your visa photo is acceptable or not for your application.
When taking a photo of your baby or toddler, no other person should be in the photo, and your child should be looking at the camera with his or her eyes open. Lay your baby on his or her back on a plain white or off-white sheet. This will ensure your baby's head is supported and provide a plain background for the photo. Make certain there are no shadows on your baby's face, especially if you take a picture from above with the baby lying down.
0コメント