Already famous as a writer of novels and essays, he tried to make a living as a screenwriter. He had little success. Huxley never seemed to grasp the requirements of the form, and his erudite literary style did not translate well to the screen. In the late forties, Huxley started to experiment with hallucinogenic drugs such as LSD and mescaline. The book he wrote about his experiences with mescaline, The Doors of Perception, influenced a young man named Jim Morrison and his friends, and they named the band they formed The Doors.
In his last major work, Island, published in , Huxley describes a doomed utopia called Pala that serves as a contrast to his earlier vision of dystopia. Huxley died on November 22, , in Los Angeles. Brave New World belongs to the genre of utopian literature. A utopia is an imaginary society organized to create ideal conditions for human beings, eliminating hatred, pain, neglect, and all of the other evils of the world. Sometimes the societies described are meant to represent the perfect society, but sometimes utopias are created to satirize existing societies, or simply to speculate about what life might be like under different conditions.
In the s, just before Brave New World was written, a number of bitterly satirical novels were written to describe the horrors of a planned or totalitarian society. The societies they describe are called dystopias, places where things are badly awry. Angelica Frey.
Classics Expert. Angelica Frey holds an M. Updated January 29, Featured Video. Cite this Article Format. Frey, Angelica. What Is Communism?
Definition and Examples. The Oath of U. Citizenship and Allegiance to the U. What Is Totalitarianism? The Appeal of Dystopian Novels for Teens. Your Privacy Rights. To change or withdraw your consent choices for ThoughtCo. No more childbirths… Human beings are cloned in bat Ford and Freud… Machinery and sexuality… These cosmic signs rule the world… Consumers and conformists constitute an ideal society… Like aphides and ants, the leaf-green Gamma girls, the black Semi-Morons swarmed round the entrances, or stood in queues to take their places in the monorail tram-cars.
How many goodly creatures are there here! How beauteous mankind is! Consumerism and conformity… It feels so much like today. View all 12 comments. I finally managed to finish the dystopian classics triangle - , Fahrenheit and Brave new World. For me the winner is Brave New World. Although I find the world imagined is less realistic than the other two it is equally tragic. I finally got that somewhat lost feeling of total happiness when reading a book, that tingle in the pleasure receptors when you find a great book.
Even though I recently read many books that I loved I seem to have lost that feeling of satisfaction when being face I finally managed to finish the dystopian classics triangle - , Fahrenheit and Brave new World. Even though I recently read many books that I loved I seem to have lost that feeling of satisfaction when being face to face with an IT book.
I thought the reason was that I started to read more, a lot more. Although I was happy that I read more and that I managed to finish books that I wanted to read for a long time the intensity of the feelings that reading stir in me had diminished.
I am so elated that I can still get immersed in a book with all my being. When I started BNW I thought that it was going to be another one of those books that you know they are a work of art an appreciate them but in the same time are not very pleasant to read. The beginning was really uncomfortable, especially the descriptions of the embryos and the erotic child games.
My hair stood up reading that. However, I quickly got absorbed and loved every second spent reading. View all 34 comments. Back in high school, one of the teachers brought a little sample from this book, and I found it totally captivating. Terrifying but at the same captivating. So, I went back to it. But at the same time, I think that the beginning is the hardest to get over. The world is being introduced to us in a rather raw way which definitely Back in high school, one of the teachers brought a little sample from this book, and I found it totally captivating.
The world is being introduced to us in a rather raw way which definitely has the potential to make people uneasy. And while it was hard to read but it was also fascinating in a way. You do not like what you see, but you cannot look away.
However, the book gave me chills; it's definitely not a "summer-read", it's quite a bit to unpack and get over what's happening. Side note, I just hope that no one ever looks at this book and thinks that it's a great idea. THAT would be terrifying. View all 8 comments. Brave New World is a vision of the future where science will at last be put full time into the service of our needs. Some of the ideas might seem a little controversial because of our preconceived ideas but we must be open minded!
Biology teaches that sex is meant to be had. To put restrictions on sex is as silly as putting restrictions on which chair to sit. And like chairs, women are meant to be pneumatic. Wonderfully pneumatic.
Why should modern man have to put up with it? Any informed person will affirm it is gross: all meat and blood and pain.
Science will solve this problem with advances in reproductive technology: thinking outside the box. Foster, "out of the realm of mere slavish imitation of nature into the much more interesting world of human invention. If you've been to a supermarket you will have seen plenty of bad parenting.
How often have you wanted to step in and rectify the situation? Let's take the important job of citizen building out of the hands of amateurs. What suffocating intimacies, what dangerous, insane, obscene relationships between the members of the family group! Maniacally, the mother brooded over her children her children … brooded over them like a cat over its kittens; but a cat that could talk, a cat that could say, "My baby, my baby," over and over again. This is something we all want. Yet we must contend with traffic jams, lost cellphones, and raised voices.
The frustration you feel is the result of a chemical reaction in your brain. Thus it is only natural that Science should offer a chemical solution. The problem here is not death per se. It is our poor attitude toward it. Rigorous psychology will help us achieve complete indifference and thus free up a lot of wasted time.
Undoing all their wholesome death-conditioning with this disgusting outcry—as though death were something terrible, as though any one mattered as much as all that! These are only needed for reference and factual information. Reading in itself is profoundly antisocial.
And, although there is little danger of anyone actually reading Shakespeare, his works are especially egregious in provoking time wasting thoughts. Gaffney, "contains only books of reference. If our young people need distraction, they can get it at the feelies. The absurdity of religion is self-evident, as every nonconforming individual knows. If there must be faith, let it be bright. Let it be in science.
One believes things because one has been conditioned to believe them. Love is the unifying idea in each of the above themes - certainly the most destructive concept ever to exist. Shakespeare of course has been largely responsible for its glorification. Brave New World is a world without pain, without hunger, with total comfort. It is a world without love. This type of reading is challenging for me. It hurts my brain!!!! Embryos were divided by their social status. Everybody must get stoned.
How am I doing? Am I understanding this book somewhat? It looked scary in Aldous Huxley! View all 44 comments. Yes, and more intense, more violent.
But what? What is there more important to say? The worship of material goods, the embracement of capitalism, the promiscuity, the growing ambivalence towards books, the self-medication to escape reality, and the overall vacuousness of people, in general. The book begins rather awkwardly in the lab where people are being created. A massive, industrial, test tube baby factory with very little variety, after all, they have determined the very best specimens so why create anything else?
Note to self: rewatch the movie Gattaca. We do meet Lenina in the lab, an uncommonly pretty woman, who feels a pat on a fanny by her supervisor is a reassurance that all is well.
Note to self: metoo movement needs a time machine. Huxley read a book on Henry Ford, who was certainly the poster child for industry and capitalism. In this book, he has become a deity of sorts. Note to self: Start using Ford for Fuck and see if anyone has a clue where such a use of the word came from. We want them to like the new ones. Fortunately, by using brainwashing techniques while everyone sleeps, they can implant the proper desires and prejudices that will make for a united and happy society.
Lenina has become hung up on a guy by the name of Henry Foster. She is dangerously close to being accused of monogamy. Sex has become a plaything to keep the masses happy. They also have soma, which is the ultimate happy pill. Anytime things become too real, they pop a tab of soma or three. It feels more than a bit like the opioid epidemic that we are struggling with currently; only soma is made readily available to all who need it and seems to have been carefully manufactured to avoid overdoses.
Overdoses would definitely be a downer that would create some of that much feared unhappiness. Bernard Marx has been trying to get Lenina to do something with him for some time. He is a bit of an odd duck among these carefully designed people. A Danny Devito among a herd of Arnold Schwarzeneggers. Note to self: Rewatch Twins , just because it is such a hoot.
There is much speculation that something went wrong in the lab, a bit too much of this or too little of that leaked into his test tube. Needless to say, he is testy about it. After all, why does he look like this while his siblings look like that? He finally convinces Lenina to go with him to an Indian reservation in America, where they meet the natives who have been untouched by technology. They get old. They get sick. They die young. They give birth. This is a povertyporn trip similar to white westerns driving through African villages so they can point and say things like Bernard is there really to feel something.
Lenina is there to become overcome by all the squalor and unfamiliar feelings of discomfort, but she is glad she came because she is going to rock her Facebook page when she gets back. Bernard decides to bring a white Savage back with him. The Savage is reading, not only reading, but reading Shakespeare. Can you imagine a person learning to read from Shakesepeare being integrated into an uneducated society such as this?
Note to self: Read Othello. The Savage is primitive and a thinker, and this will prove to be a dangerous combination.
He will see the absurdity in everything. He will protest violently I had forgotten about all the humor in the book. Huxley is poking fun at nearly everything we hold sacred. Satire is the perfect vehicle for modern comedians like John Oliver, Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, Samantha Bee, and Bill Maher to make their political points and make their audience laugh as well.
We seem to need our truths given to us with a dose of sugar. Even in this futuristic utopia, Huxley called it a negative utopia, the population still needs healthy doses of soma to keep up the pretense that everything is fine.
The people who rebel are those who find integration to be a problem or, like Bernard, feel disadvantages from the very beginning of their life. One size does not fit all, even when everyone is manufactured to be the same.
A society will always be judged by the tolerance it shows for those different than the majority. View all 28 comments. Mar 02, Nataliya rated it liked it Shelves: reads. Brave New World is a classic written to make its readers uncomfortable. It accomplishes its point well.
Still, it is only getting 3 stars from me, as I rate books based on my personal level of enjoyment rather than literary value. The characters of this book were not meant to be likeable - I am fine with that concept.
The first few chapters made me want to curl up in the corner and cry - that's how repulsive the design of this universe was mission accomplished, Mr. But as we plunge int Brave New World is a classic written to make its readers uncomfortable. But as we plunge into the depths of the neverending moral message of the story basically the entire last third of the book , I felt my patience stretching thin.
I get the message, no need to beat me over the head with it. I did chuckle at the ridiculous consumerism of this world inspired by America of the turn of the century in which, unexpectedly, most characters have distinct socialist names - Lenina, Trotsky, Marx, Bernard as in G.
I just think it's funny how both of the enemies of Huxley's ideal world - the competing ideologies of socialism and rampant consumerism - were dealt with in one blow. Good try - but come on! I liked the description of the effects of soma drug on the mind. No wonder, as this was written by the author of The Doors of Perception about mescaline effects on the mind - an interesting read, by the way. Of the classic trio of dystopian books this one, Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four and Zamyatin's We this one is my least favorite We is the best, in my opinion, and may have actually inspired this one.
Brave New World succeeds at portraying dystopia at its worst and making the reader think, but stilted language and moral heavy-handedness take away from the enjoyment. Yet it's a classic, and should be read, even if not for fun. View all 19 comments. I think I read it wrong. Because my first thought upon finishing this was this: Where the hell do I sign up for this Brave New World?
Basically, this society is missing religion, shame, sin, misery, fear, disease, and classic books. Now, that's not to say life is perfect in this utopia. Nobody gets married and has kids anymore. I know, a lot of you are thinking that isn't quite the downside that the book thinks it is. No more monogamy? Whatever would we do?
The new people are grown in test tu I think I read it wrong. The new people are grown in test tubes. There are the dumb ones who do the menial shit, the average ones who do the office stuff, and the smarter ones who run the show. Can you imagine if people were actually set up to be in charge by nothing more than a coincidence of birth? That's some crazy sci-fi caste shenanigans right there. So what we have here is job security, free drugs that don't have side effects and make you feel good, non-judgemental sex, no conflict, no health issues till you die, and no barky religious folks knocking on your door at 9 am on a Saturday.
And what are you missing out on, pray tell? I've read his stuff, and I can say without a doubt that I could skip it and make do with a Micheal Bay movie. Fair warning, no one has ever accused me of being someone they aspire to emulate. Even the evil overlord in charge of it all wasn't that bad of a dude. When these guys met him and confronted him with their doubts as to how well they actually enjoyed their place in society, he just sent them to an island full of like-minded individuals so they could do what they wanted without disrupting the flow of things.
He was kind of like, yeah, this isn't for everyone and sent them off with a wave of his chill hand. For the entire book, I kept waiting for the Soylent Green is People moment, but it never really came. To me, that world did not appear worse than ours in any significant way.
The only weird thing was that being a mother or father was shameful and no one was monogamous. That's not exactly the most horrifying thing I've ever heard happening in a dystopian novel.
Especially if the other option is to be like John, who flogged himself every time he got a boner over cute little Lenina. I kept waiting for some sort of redemption arc for this savage wherein he stopped being a complete asshat, but that didn't happen. He was creepy as fuck right up till the end. Movement toward socialism in the s, for example, becomes, in Huxley's future, the totalitarian World State. Questioning of religious beliefs and the growth of materialism, likewise, transforms into a religion of consumerism with Henry Ford as its god.
And if Model T's roll off the assembly line in the present, in a stream of identical cars, then in the future, human beings will be mass-produced, too. Huxley's future vision, by turns witty and disturbing, imagines the end of a familiar, traditional life and the triumph of all that is new and strange in the modern world. In constructing an imaginary world, Huxley contributes to a long tradition — the utopian fiction.
More used his fictional Utopia to point out the problems present in his own society. Since then, writers have created utopias to challenge readers to think about the underlying assumptions of their own culture. Gulliver's Travels , by Jonathan Swift, seems at first to be a book of outlandish travel stories. Yet throughout the narratives, Swift employs his fictional worlds ironically to make serious arguments about the injustices of his own Britain.
In utopian fiction, imagination becomes a way to explore alternatives in political, social, and religious life.
In Huxley's time, the most popular writer of utopian fiction was H. Wells held an optimistic view of the future, with an internationalist perspective, and so his utopias reflected the end of national divisions and the growth of a truly humane civilization, as he saw it. When Huxley read Wells' Men Like Gods , he was inspired to make fun of its optimism with his characteristically ironic wit. What began as a parody turned into a novel of its own — Brave New World. The brave new world of Huxley's novel is not a "good place," and so it is not, in the strictest terms, a utopia.
Huxley himself called his world a "negative utopia," the opposite of the traditional utopia.
0コメント